|
From: | Roy Badami |
Subject: | Re: [Duplicity-talk] changed files not being backed up |
Date: | Fri, 23 Dec 2011 14:24:52 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 |
On 23/12/2011 12:21, Wolfgang Rohdewald wrote:
I don't think there's any need to compare both - the ctime should be updated by all operations that modify the inode in any way, so it shouldn't be possible to have the mtime change without the ctime also chaning.Am Freitag, 23. Dezember 2011, 12:57:52 schrieb Georg Lutz:But strong checksumming is not necessary here. It would be enough to compare ctime instead of mtime.better compare both
-- Roy Badami Roboreus Ltd Third Floor The Place 175 High Holborn London WC1V 7AA
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |