duplicity-talk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Duplicity-talk] Backup problems 0.6.17


From: Kenneth Loafman
Subject: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Backup problems 0.6.17
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 09:12:35 -0600

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:00 AM, <address@hidden> wrote:
On 08.01.2012 22:03, Ken Bass wrote:
> I've got an rdiff-backup from Windows to Linux for my Desktop and My Documents folder.
>
> I am basically using duplicity to backup the rdiff-backup results to an offline site.
>
> My "Desktop" folder is rather large (over 1G).
>
> The problem is that duplicity did the initial full backup two nights ago. After it completed, I waited a few hours and ran everything manually, and saw that a small incremental was created since nothing had changed. When I got up this morning, all 1G was re-uploaded. Why in the world is duplicity uploading things that have not changed? It only did this for my Desktop, no other folders. Just as a sample I used the restore option to grab the original backup and last nights large incremental. When I compared a few files they were identical.  What in the world would cause this and how would I go about find out why?
>
> To avoid the wasted money and bandwidth, I have reduced the size of my backup, blew away my backup, and am starting over.
>
> I don't have the archive anymore, but I do have a verbose level 5 log.
>

files are also backed up on timestamp changes.. please compare those too. duplicity backing up unnecessary because some software touched files is a known issue.
 
Instead of using rdiff-backup results, why not just backup the desktop using duplicity directly.  IOW, use both if you need to.

...Ken


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]