Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups?

[edgar . soldin]

On 31.05.2015 18:23, Remy van Elst wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/31/2015 06:18 PM, address@hidden wrote:
>> On 31.05.2015 17:51, Remy van Elst wrote:
>>>
> [...]
>>>
> 
>> btw. 74k files is quite a lot.. you might want to consider raising
>> your volume size.
> 
> 
> What is the benefit of that? And, what would be a good size? (It now
> is 25 MB).
> 

primarily less handling overhead for duplicity hence a slightly faster backup. 
and of course, less files on the backend. some backends limit the amount of 
files possible.

which size is best for you is up to you and the backend constraints and your 
local temp space.

good luck.. ede