Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity using 1.5 TB storage and loosing incremental backups?

[Remy van Elst]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256



On 05/31/2015 06:31 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> On 31.05.2015 18:23, Remy van Elst wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 05/31/2015 06:18 PM, address@hidden wrote:
>>> On 31.05.2015 17:51, Remy van Elst wrote:
>>>> 
>> [...]
>>>> 
>> 
>>> btw. 74k files is quite a lot.. you might want to consider
>>> raising your volume size.
>> 
>> 
>> What is the benefit of that? And, what would be a good size? (It
>> now is 25 MB).
>> 
> 
> primarily less handling overhead for duplicity hence a slightly
> faster backup. and of course, less files on the backend. some
> backends limit the amount of files possible.
> 
> which size is best for you is up to you and the backend constraints
> and your local temp space.

Can I just change the volsize with an already existing chain? What
effects does that have?

> 
> good luck.. ede
> 
> _______________________________________________ Duplicity-talk
> mailing list address@hidden 
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVazziAAoJECtnVb0bf4jcu8EH/1AgRCv8/wo4DGAs+MF19Kxs
uzitJ6w/qUMB18wAIKNFe8K6Kbs47mBvgeobHYBqb8QpbqjksZkcWYJxqC3xXHHo
bdS+iYNACZdxHJ+0YwgOP3p4AuVppJhUeZDT7sadnO/nAehv47nHfzBy8YIyBSyA
iUyHDM7yDLkYluKWX/N0X3j+6DP2pRWglqTiJB9a4oQ2T9vXsZ7LclihzwZfgA6G
A7b4EPsNcWuLGxH/AaJSy6/5rD5RYrywajyNwNb1dLJaTQ4OIlcQpRHnSsfVOX/U
jm4Uq5hcrgltTUnSiPNOxFc/zsUqa3e0ge5KmzHkE8/hDjPBJJ9JK3JccsLxE3k=
=GP9n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

0x1B7F88DC.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

0x1B7F88DC.asc.sig
Description: PGP signature