duplicity-talk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Duplicity-talk] Can't delete duplicity s3/glacier archives?


From: edgar . soldin
Subject: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Can't delete duplicity s3/glacier archives?
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 10:34:27 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0

On 29.07.2022 22:15, Henry S. Thompson via Duplicity-talk wrote:
For backing up my system to s3, I'm running:

  - duplicity 0.8.17
  - Python 3.9.2
  - boto3 '1.24.36'

My daily backups run fine.  As desired they are moved from s3 to
glacier after a month, duplicity status shows everything as it should,
with monthly full backups and daily incrementals, going back 62
months, e.g.

   Secondary chain 54 of 62:
   -------------------------
   Chain start time: Sun Oct 24 02:05:01 2021
   Chain end time: Tue Nov 23 02:05:01 2021
   Number of contained backup sets: 31
   Total number of contained volumes: 8223
    Type of backup set:                            Time:   Number of volumes:
                   Full         Sun Oct 24 02:05:01 2021              6450
            Incremental         Mon Oct 25 02:05:02 2021                64
                  ...[30 more incrementals]...

But when I try to prune old incrementals

   duplicity remove-all-inc-of-but-n-full 7 --force boto3+s3:///[bucket name]/

I get

   Local and Remote metadata are synchronized, no sync needed.
   Last full backup date: none
   No old backup sets found, nothing deleted.

I've searched and found nothing.

Is the problem perhaps because the older archives are on glacier? The
metadata is all on s3 as it should be...

looks wrong indeed.

can you please post _full_ command lines (obfuscate private strings) for

- daily backup
- status (with working result)
- remove-all...

are the AWS env vars identical, so you are 100% tat you are accessing the same 
bucket? ..ede/duply.net




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]