[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:02:31 -0800 |
> Isn't there a nicer way the groups can be separated?
We could use overlays to display the ^L as something more visually
appealing, while leaving ^L in the buffer.
Yes, that's what I was thinking too. The ^L should stay, but can be made
more user-friendly.
> I also get a long list with latin key characters that are bound to
> encoded-kbd-self-insert-ccl.
I think this is a bug.
I see that list too. I thought it was intended, but didn't know what it was
for. It is quite annoying, in any case.
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, (continued)
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/11
- RE: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Drew Adams, 2005/11/11
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/11
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/11/11
Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/11
RE: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/11
- RE: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Drew Adams, 2005/11/11
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/11/11
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, David Reitter, 2005/11/11
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/11/11
- Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, David Reitter, 2005/11/11
Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Miles Bader, 2005/11/11
Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, David Reitter, 2005/11/11
RE: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Drew Adams, 2005/11/11
Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/11/12