[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELPA policy
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: ELPA policy |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:06:17 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
>>>>> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> This plan seems good, overall, But in the specific case of stream.el and
> seq.el, shouldn't they be maintained in the core? I don't see stream.el in
> the sources I fetched, but seq.el is small, in emacs-lisp, and it says
> Maintainer: emacs-devel.
If that's the case, then yes, it should be in core. I'm personally a bit
surprised that a library of this nature is in ELPA, unless it was being
provided and actively maintained by a non-core developer.
John
- Re: ELPA policy, (continued)
- Re: ELPA policy, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/09
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/09
- Re: ELPA policy, Achim Gratz, 2015/11/09
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/09
- Re: ELPA policy, Achim Gratz, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/09
- Re: ELPA policy,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: ELPA policy, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/09
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/10
- Re: ELPA policy, Nicolas Petton, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, Nicolas Petton, 2015/11/09
- Re: ELPA policy, Nicolas Petton, 2015/11/09
- Re: ELPA policy, Nicolas Petton, 2015/11/09
- Re: ELPA policy, Aaron Ecay, 2015/11/09
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/09
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10