[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A target that's even more bootstrap?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: A target that's even more bootstrap? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jun 2019 18:21:25 +0300 |
> From: address@hidden (Phillip Lord)
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:29:41 +0100
>
> >> If I understand it, distclean is most severe. So, why not ditch
> >> everything other than distclean and clean?
> >
> > Because the GCS says otherwise?
>
> The GCS differentiate between "clean" and "mostlyclean" with "may". So,
> mostlyclean and clean could be the same.
They could do the same, but you asked about ditching them, not about
making them do the same.
> extraclean isn't required and but could be the same as
> maintainer-clean.
No, I think they should be separate, if only because maintainer-clean
is useful on its own right.
- A target that's even more bootstrap?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/06/18
- Re: A target that's even more bootstrap?, Andreas Schwab, 2019/06/18
- Re: A target that's even more bootstrap?, Phillip Lord, 2019/06/18
- Re: A target that's even more bootstrap?, Stefan Monnier, 2019/06/18
- Re: A target that's even more bootstrap?, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/18
- Re: A target that's even more bootstrap?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/06/19
- Re: A target that's even more bootstrap?, Andreas Schwab, 2019/06/19
- Re: A target that's even more bootstrap?, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/19
- Re: A target that's even more bootstrap?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/06/19
Re: A target that's even more bootstrap?, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/06/18