[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes for emacs 28
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: Changes for emacs 28 |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:51:28 -0700 |
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> For what it's worth, I do not think this is a good idea. Emacs
> distributors should do whatever they think is best, and for emacs-devel
> to chide them (even as gently as in these issues) for their decisions is
> counter-productive at best.
Good point. I never considered that it could be seen as chiding them.
Maybe it was a mistake for me to insist on this idea.
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, (continued)
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/12
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Caio Henrique, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Caio Henrique, 2020/09/12
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Göktuğ Kayaalp, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28,
Stefan Kangas <=
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Drew Adams, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Stefan Kangas, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Göktuğ Kayaalp, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Stefan Kangas, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Göktuğ Kayaalp, 2020/09/12
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/11