[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A modern-mode?
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
Re: A modern-mode? |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:32:49 -0400 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 12:17, Andrea Corallo via Emacs development
discussions. <emacs-devel@gnu.org> wrote:
> I imagine myself in the condition of giving a suggestion to a colleague
> for trying out Emacs. It's very easy to suggest like '-m'. IMO it is
> already considerably more complex to start explaining --eval... or the
You could use --funcall (or the short from -f), as in: '-f
emacs-2021-mode'. This gets around the potential difficulties of
escaping parens that --eval has. I don't think much explanation should
be needed.
- Re: A modern-mode?, (continued)
- Re: A modern-mode?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?,
Noam Postavsky <=
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alan Third, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/17