[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Dec 2020 23:35:42 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> 1) License disclosure: The summaries indicate that RMS is open to having
> the repository host packages bearing *any* free license,
Actually no. The rules, in README.org, say the license has to be
compatible with GPL 3-or-later, which is the licensing of GNU Emacs
itself.
but there
> may be users who are pickier, so a package's license should be
> disclosed prominently on the listing page and the package detail
> page;
That seems like a good idea.
> 2) The acceptance or candidacy process for each package should be
> documented in some discrete method.
Whether to have a certain package in NonGNU ELPA could be a touchy
question, in some borderline cases. Stating the reasons could perhaps
hurt feelings, or lead to arguments. So it is best not to do that.
We will add a package or we won't.
If you know about a package we don't add, you will be able to find it
(without our help).
> 3) After a package is initially accepted to the repository, the
> summaries of Richard Stallman's presentation indicate that subsequent
> commits or releases may be rejected or modified. That record should
> also be documented.
It could be a good idea to document the reasons for decisions like these.
Future maintainers will need to understand this.
I don't think we should make a commitment to publish this without exception,
but usually there will be no reason not to.
> 4) There's no link on the repository page[1] to the software being used
> to generate it, and the forge at which it is being developed.
It would be fine to add that info.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, (continued)
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Jean Louis, 2020/12/12
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/12/12
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Richard Stallman, 2020/12/12
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Richard Stallman, 2020/12/13
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Jean Louis, 2020/12/14
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Vasilij Schneidermann, 2020/12/14
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Jean Louis, 2020/12/14
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Boruch Baum, 2020/12/14
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Jean Louis, 2020/12/14
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Richard Stallman, 2020/12/16
Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Boruch Baum, 2020/12/10
- "Open records", "good government principles", "corporate culture", Boruch Baum, 2020/12/10
- Re: "Open records", "good government principles", "corporate culture", Jean Louis, 2020/12/10
- Re: "Open records", "good government principles", "corporate culture", Eli Zaretskii, 2020/12/10
- Re: "Open records", "good government principles", "corporate culture", Richard Stallman, 2020/12/11
Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking, Jean Louis, 2020/12/10