Re: ELPA: new package nano-agenda

[Philip Kaludercic]

"Nicolas P. Rougier (inria)" <nicolas.rougier@inria.fr> writes:

> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> It seems you are using ts.el, which isn't on ELPA, and additionally
>> depends
>> on s.el that also (famously) isn't on ELPA.
>>
>> That being said, ts seems to only have a weak dependency on s (two
>> usages of s-join), so maybe ts could be added to ELPA -- in one form
>> or
>> another -- as it seems to have a few useful improvements over the
>> default time and duration functions.
>
> Thanks for the review, I didn't pay attention to this point
> actually. I confirm than ts would be a very nice addition to ELPA
> since it really simplifies time management for user and comes with a
> very clean API. I guess only Adam Porter can answer if he want to add
> it to ELPA or not. 

As he is the only major contributor, this might be worth considering.
I've Cc'ed Adam to see what he thinks.

What might be an issue is if the "ts-" namespace is considered to be
"too valuable", as was the issue with "s-" and "f-". The maintainers
would have to decide on that, I can only speculate.

> Should I try to remove the dependency in the meantime?

Personally, I'd wait to see.

-- 
        Philip Kaludercic