[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELPA: new package nano-agenda
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: ELPA: new package nano-agenda |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:55:53 +0000 |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>>> What might be an issue is if the "ts-" namespace is considered to be
>>> "too valuable", as was the issue with "s-" and "f-". The maintainers
>>> would have to decide on that, I can only speculate.
>
> two-letter (well, 3 if you count the dash) prefixes are fine, thanks
> (we have loads of them).
Really? When I run
(seq-count
(lambda (ent)
(<= (length (symbol-name (car ent))) 2))
package-archive-contents)
all I get is one result (xr).
--
Philip Kaludercic
- ELPA: new package nano-agenda, Nicolas P. Rougier (inria), 2021/10/12
- Re: ELPA: new package nano-agenda, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/10/12
- Re: ELPA: new package nano-agenda, Nicolas P. Rougier (inria), 2021/10/12
- Re: ELPA: new package nano-agenda, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/10/12
- Re: ELPA: new package nano-agenda, Adam Porter, 2021/10/18
- Re: ELPA: new package nano-agenda, Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/18
- Re: ELPA: new package nano-agenda,
Philip Kaludercic <=
- Re: ELPA: new package nano-agenda, Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/19
- Re: ELPA: new package nano-agenda, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/10/19
- Re: ELPA: new package nano-agenda, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/10/21
Re: ELPA: new package nano-agenda, Joost Kremers, 2021/10/19