[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Entering emojis
|
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
|
Subject: |
Re: Entering emojis |
|
Date: |
Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:22:33 +0000 |
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> Sure -- aliases for normal functions are a pain (because when reading
> code, the reader will be puzzled when encountering the variations), but
> these are user commands, so it's probably fine.
Yeah, I think there is some logic to it in the particular cases
"list-*", "insert-*", "describe-*" and maybe a handful of others.
- Re: Entering emojis, (continued)
Re: Entering emojis, Matthias Meulien, 2021/10/25
Re: Entering emojis, T.V Raman, 2021/10/25
Re: Entering emojis, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/26
Re: Entering emojis, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/27
- Re: Entering emojis, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/27
- Re: Entering emojis, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/27
- Re: Entering emojis, Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/27
- Re: Entering emojis, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/27
- Move shorthands.el to lisp/emacs-lisp/?, Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/27
- Re: Move shorthands.el to lisp/emacs-lisp/?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/28
- Re: Move shorthands.el to lisp/emacs-lisp/?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/29
- Re: Move shorthands.el to lisp/emacs-lisp/?, Yuri Khan, 2021/10/29
- Re: Move shorthands.el to lisp/emacs-lisp/?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/29