Re: sqlite3

[Stefan Kangas]

Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:

> Regardless of whether or not this feature is implemented, I think it
> should be optional, and fallbacks should be in place for systems where
> SQLite is unavailable.

SQLite is everywhere, is it not?  So we add it as a build dependency,
just like we do with other things.

> For example, I tried compiling the latest SQLite amalgamation release
> with DJGPP, and it did not work.  Apparently patches existed to make it
> work, but they do not apply to the latest release anymore.

Is DJGPP relevant outside of the MS-DOS build?

> Customize gaining a hard dependency on SQLite3 would be a disaster!

What disastrous things would happen?