[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sqlite3
From: |
Qiantan Hong |
Subject: |
Re: sqlite3 |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Dec 2021 19:51:51 +0000 |
> You get SQL interpretter/byte-compiler so you can use SQL to work with your
> data. But Lars obviously, as I understand from last mails, is thinking of
> key-value settings a lá Firefox in Emacs, so I have no idea if he plans to
> expose SQL interface or not.
>
In that case, it’s unclear to me how much we really get from SQL comparing
to LISt Processing we already have.
If we really benefit from a relational/logical programming language,
I’d also strongly recommend Prolog over SQL.
Prolog blends better with Lisp (homoiconicity), is strictly more
expressive (relational calculus is equivalent to a very restricted
subset of Prolog, with no negation, cut, function symbol, and recursion),
and is easily embedded into Lisp.
Best,
Qiantan
- Re: sqlite3, (continued)
- Re: sqlite3, Yuri Khan, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Stefan Monnier, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Qiantan Hong, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Stefan Monnier, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Arthur Miller, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Arthur Miller, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Qiantan Hong, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Arthur Miller, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3,
Qiantan Hong <=
- Re: sqlite3, Qiantan Hong, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Karl Fogel, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Stefan Kangas, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Po Lu, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Stefan Kangas, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz, 2021/12/06
Re: sqlite3, Stefan Kangas, 2021/12/06