[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sqlite3
From: |
Jose A. Ortega Ruiz |
Subject: |
Re: sqlite3 |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Dec 2021 16:58:25 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Mon, Dec 06 2021, Po Lu wrote:
[...]
> For example, we would lose the ability to inspect custom files as
> plain text. In many cases, customize has written bad data to my
> custom file that prevented Emacs from working, but I could always edit
> the custom file manually to get things working again.
>
> This would not be so easy with a binary database.
FWIW, this is also what was worrying me about this idea of moving
customizations to a binary format, be it sqlite or any other. Sounds to
me exactly like moving from text-based configurations a la Unix to the
Windows Registry, a move that i for one would like to side-step if
possible.
Cheers,
jao
--
The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the
surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90
million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some
indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be. -Douglas Adams
- Re: sqlite3, (continued)
- Re: sqlite3, Arthur Miller, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Arthur Miller, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Qiantan Hong, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Arthur Miller, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Qiantan Hong, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Qiantan Hong, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Karl Fogel, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Stefan Kangas, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Po Lu, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3, Stefan Kangas, 2021/12/06
- Re: sqlite3,
Jose A. Ortega Ruiz <=
Re: sqlite3, Stefan Kangas, 2021/12/06
Re: sqlite3, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/06