Re: Tree-sitter maturity

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 29/12/2024 11:14, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> The grammars don't make any backwards compatibility guarantees. There have been 
> multiple Emacs bugs arising from grammars unilaterally changing terminal names 
> and such. ISTM the only way to guarantee compatibility is to vendor the whole 
> stack.

Keeping the list of grammar repos' urls and the "last known working" 
commit hashes is a way to achieve the same (with 99.9% certainty) 
without the associated burden of maintaining the vendored code and the 
commit history churn.