[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is this proper time format?
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: Is this proper time format? |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Jun 2023 10:42:12 +0000 |
David Masterson <dsmasterson@gmail.com> writes:
>> See the attached final draft.
>
> What's the command to save the attachment? It doesn't look like a mime
> attachment to me,
In message-mode:
C-c C-a runs the command mml-attach-file (found in message-mode-map),
which is an autoloaded interactive native-compiled Lisp function in
‘mml.el’.
It is bound to C-c RET f and C-c C-a.
>> I also slightly adjusted the wording and fixed list indentation in
>> one of description list items.
>
> One minor note -- I think of datestamp & timestamp as one word each
> while 'date range' & 'time range' are two words each. Unless you've got
> other reasons, I'd follow this convention. I think I see one 'cindex'
> that has 'timerange'.
I left the incorrectly spelled 'timerange' cindex entry on purpose.
In Org, we have variables `org-agenda-timerange-leaders' and
`org-agenda-remove-timeranges-from-blocks'. So, in Info-mode, some
people may search index for 'timerange' instead of 'time range'. Again,
the purpose is helping searchability.
I now applied to patch onto main.
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=d50956e48
>> Please note that with this patch your total contribution is approaching
>> non-trivial 15LOC. Further patches will require FSF copyright
>> assignment.
>
> You got the number via some 'git' command?? If I get to doing more, I
> will do the copyright assignment -- I just never thought I'd make much
> changes.
Not exactly. There is git command to find total number of changed LOCs:
<https://github.com/yantar92/emacs-config/blob/master/config.org#detect-fsf-contribution-status-of-sender-for-org-ml>
(shell-command-to-string
(format "cd ~/Git/org-mode/; git log --author=\"%s\"
--pretty=tformat: --numstat main | gawk '{ add += $1; subs += $2; loc += $1 -
$2 } END { printf \"+l: %%s -l: %%s total: %%s\", add, subs, loc }' -"
(downcase (if (string-match-p email all-committers)
email sender))))
However, it will count all the LOCs, not just non-trivial.
By raw number of LOCs, your patch is indeed over 15LOC. However, part of
the patch is my text or syncing org-manual and org-guide texts. Those
changes are trivial.
So, I judged that the patch is still acceptable without FSF assignment.
But it will be the limit.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
Applied.
- Re: Is this proper time format?, (continued)
- Re: Is this proper time format?, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/06/13
- Re: Is this proper time format?, David Masterson, 2023/06/14
- Re: Is this proper time format?, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/06/14
- Re: Is this proper time format?, David Masterson, 2023/06/14
- Re: Is this proper time format?, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/06/15
- Re: Is this proper time format?, David Masterson, 2023/06/15
- Re: Is this proper time format?, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/06/16
- Re: Is this proper time format?, David Masterson, 2023/06/16
- Re: Is this proper time format?, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/06/17
- Re: Is this proper time format?, David Masterson, 2023/06/18
- Re: Is this proper time format?,
Ihor Radchenko <=
- Re: Is this proper time format?, David Masterson, 2023/06/18
- Re: Is this proper time format?, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/06/18
- Re: Is this proper time format?, David Masterson, 2023/06/19
- Re: Is this proper time format?, David Masterson, 2023/06/09
- Re: Is this proper time format?, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/06/23