freeipmi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Freeipmi-devel] Re: [Freeipmi-users] querying sensors of Intel SE7210TP


From: Christian Ruppert
Subject: [Freeipmi-devel] Re: [Freeipmi-users] querying sensors of Intel SE7210TP1-E board fails with ipmi_sdr_cache_create: internal IPMI error
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:56:36 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110103 Thunderbird/3.1.7

# ipmiutil sel -v -x
ipmiutil ver 2.67
isel: version 2.67
ipmi_open: driver type = unknown
ipmi_open_mv: cannot open /dev/ipmi/0
ipmi_open_mv: cannot open /dev/ipmi0
ipmi_open_mv: cannot open /dev/ipmidev0
ipmi_open_mv: cannot open /dev/ipmidev/0
imbapi ipmi_open_ia: open(/dev/imb) failed: No such file or directory
smbios: Driver=8(SMBus), sa=84, Base=0x0400, Spacing=1
BMC SSIF/SMBus Interface at i2c=84 base=0x0400
ipmidir Cmd=01 NetFn=06 Lun=00 Sa=20 Data(0):
ipmidir Resp: status=0 cc=00, Data(11): 20 81 02 40 51 9f 22 03 00 11 43
open_direct: status=0, SMBus drv, ipmi=1
ipmi_open rc = 0 type = smb
Driver type smb, open rc = 0
ipmidir Cmd=01 NetFn=06 Lun=00 Sa=20 Data(0):
ipmidir Resp: status=0 cc=00, Data(11): 20 81 02 40 51 9f 22 03 00 11 43
-- BMC version 2.40, IPMI version 1.5
ipmidir Cmd=40 NetFn=0a Lun=00 Sa=20 Data(0):
ipmidir Resp: status=0 cc=00, Data(14): 51 00 00 c0 05 00 00 00 00 d3 17
48 4d 02
GetSelInfo status = 0
SEL Ver 51 Support 02, Size = 92 records (Used=0, Free=92)
isel completed successfully

# bmc-info -D kcs --disable-auto-probe --driver-address=0x84
--register-spacing=1
ipmi-kcs-driver.c: 748: ipmi_kcs_write: error 'BMC busy' (7)
ipmi-kcs-driver-api.c: 251: _kcs_cmd_write: error 'BMC busy' (7)
ipmi-device-global-cmds-api.c: 87: ipmi_cmd_get_device_id: error
'internal system error' (31)
ipmi_cmd_get_device_id: internal system error

On 02/14/2011 07:34 PM, Albert Chu wrote:
> Hey Christian,
> 
> Could you run
> 
> ipmiutil sel -v -x
> 
> the -x is to get some debug info, the "sel -v" is to just get a shorter
> output (don't need all the sensor debug info, just how ipmiutil is
> getting to the data :-).
> 
> One other random thought.  I think it's possible that your motherboard
> supports the KCS driver, it's just not "advertised".  Perhaps you can
> give
> 
> bmc-info -D kcs --disable-auto-probe --driver-address=0x84
> --register-spacing=1 a shot?
> 
> Al
> 
> On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 05:32 -0800, Christian Ruppert wrote:
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>> I don't get any data with the other commands at all.
>>
>> # ipmi-chassis --get-chassis-status
>> ipmi-ssif-driver.c: 269: _ipmi_i2c_smbus_access: errno '' (6)
>> ipmi-ssif-driver-api.c: 266: _ssif_cmd_read: error 'internal system
>> error' (12)
>> ipmi-chassis-cmds-api.c: 146: ipmi_cmd_get_chassis_status: error
>> 'internal system error' (31)
>> ipmi_cmd_get_chassis_status: internal system error
>>
>> # bmc-device --get-ssif-interface-capabilities
>> ipmi-ssif-driver.c: 269: _ipmi_i2c_smbus_access: errno '' (6)
>> ipmi-ssif-driver-api.c: 266: _ssif_cmd_read: error 'internal system
>> error' (12)
>> ipmi-messaging-support-cmds-api.c: 693:
>> ipmi_cmd_get_system_interface_capabilities_ssif: error 'internal system
>> error' (31)
>> ipmi_cmd_get_system_interface_capabilities_ssif: internal system error
>>
>> and so on...
>>
>> Somebody told me about ipmiutil, it seems to work.
>>
>> # ipmiutil sensor -s
>> ipmiutil ver 2.67
>> isensor: version 2.67
>> -- BMC version 2.40, IPMI version 1.5
>> Full sensor   [000a]| snum 0b | Baseboard 1.5V   | OK   | 1.52 Volts
>> GetSensorReading error cb Requested sensor, data, or record not present
>> Full sensor   [000b]| snum 0c | Baseboard 3.3V   | OK   | 0.00 Volts
>> GetSensorReading error cb Requested sensor, data, or record not present
>> Full sensor   [000c]| snum 0d | Baseboard 5.0V   | OK   | 0.00 Volts
>> GetSensorReading error cb Requested sensor, data, or record not present
>> Full sensor   [000d]| snum 0e | Baseboard 12V    | OK   | 0.00 Volts
>> Full sensor   [000e]| snum 10 | Processor Vccp   | OK   | 1.35 Volts
>> Full sensor   [000f]| snum 11 | Baseboard Temp   | OK   | 34.00 degrees C
>> ...
>>
>> I would be glad if we could fix that in FreeIPMI too :)
>> I could give you access to the box with that SSIF device, if you want :)
>>
>> On 02/12/2011 02:44 AM, Albert Chu wrote:
>>> Hey Christian,
>>>
>>>> No luck with 0x84 but 0x42 looks better, I hope it helps.
>>>
>>> That's good.  I guess the random luck of the order I probe devices isn't
>>> good for your motherboard.  I'd like to flip the probing order around
>>> for you, but I'm sort of afraid it'll mess up another persons system.
>>> Let me see if I can come up w/ something more creative to deal with
>>> this.
>>>
>>> But atleast in the short term you have something that would work for
>>> you.  If you configure /etc/freeipmi/freeipmi.conf, you can set the
>>> below as defaults so that you don't have to type them everytime.
>>>
>>>> ipmi-ssif-driver.c: 269: _ipmi_i2c_smbus_access: errno '' (6)
>>>
>>> This is really odd, errno 6 = ENXIO which means "no such device or
>>> address", but clearly it just worked w/ the previous packet.  I wonder
>>> if the ENXIO refers to something deeper inside IPMI, not something
>>> related to the actual device.
>>>
>>> Could you try other random IPMI commands, ipmi-chassis, bmc-device,
>>> ipmi-sensors, ipmi-sel, and see what they output.  Perhaps I need to
>>> handle ENXIO a special way, maybe it means something.
>>>
>>> Al
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 16:05 -0800, Christian Ruppert wrote:
>>>> No luck with 0x84 but 0x43 looks better, I hope it helps.
>>>>
>>>> # bmc-info -D ssif --disable-auto-probe --driver-address=0x84
>>>> --driver-device=/dev/i2c-0 --register-spacing=1
>>>> ipmi-ssif-driver.c: 685: ipmi_ssif_ctx_io_init: errno '' (22)
>>>> ipmi-api.c: 1012: ipmi_ctx_open_inband: error 'internal error' (13)
>>>> ipmi-api.c: 2029: ipmi_ctx_close: error 'device not open' (16)
>>>> ipmi_ctx_open_inband: internal error
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> bmc-info -D ssif --disable-auto-probe --driver-address=0x42
>>>> --driver-device=/dev/i2c-0 --register-spacing=1
>>>>
>>>> Device ID             : 32
>>>> Device Revision       : 1
>>>> Device SDRs           : supported
>>>> Firmware Revision     : 2.40
>>>> Device Available      : yes (normal operation)
>>>> IPMI Version          : 1.5
>>>> Sensor Device         : supported
>>>> SDR Repository Device : supported
>>>> SEL Device            : supported
>>>> FRU Inventory Device  : supported
>>>> IPMB Event Receiver   : supported
>>>> IPMB Event Generator  : unsupported
>>>> Bridge                : unsupported
>>>> Chassis Device        : supported
>>>> Manufacturer ID       : National Semiconductor (802)
>>>> Product ID            : 17169
>>>>
>>>> ipmi-ssif-driver.c: 269: _ipmi_i2c_smbus_access: errno '' (6)
>>>> ipmi-ssif-driver-api.c: 266: _ssif_cmd_read: error 'internal system
>>>> error' (12)
>>>> ipmi-device-global-cmds-api.c: 422: ipmi_cmd_get_device_guid: error
>>>> 'internal system error' (31)
>>>> ipmi_cmd_get_device_guid: internal system error
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 02/09/2011 10:56 PM, Albert Chu wrote:
>>>>> Hey Christian,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the traces.  I noticed something peculiar in the ipmi-locate
>>>>> output.
>>>>>
>>>>> Probing SSIF device using DMIDECODE... done
>>>>> IPMI Version: 1.5
>>>>> IPMI locate driver: DMIDECODE
>>>>> IPMI interface: SSIF
>>>>> BMC driver device: /dev/i2c-0
>>>>> BMC SMBUS slave address: 0x42
>>>>> Register spacing: 1
>>>>>
>>>>> Probing SSIF device using SMBIOS... done
>>>>> IPMI Version: 1.5
>>>>> IPMI locate driver: SMBIOS
>>>>> IPMI interface: SSIF
>>>>> BMC driver device: /dev/i2c-0
>>>>> BMC SMBUS slave address: 0x84
>>>>> Register spacing: 1
>>>>>
>>>>> The probing finds 2 different slave addresses.  I'm not sure why.
>>>>> Perhaps you could try setting the driver values manually to see if it
>>>>> changes things??
>>>>>
>>>>> bmc-info -D ssif --disable-auto-probe --driver-address=0x84
>>>>> --driver-device=/dev/i2c-0 --register-spacing=1
>>>>>
>>>>> and also try 0x42 for the driver-address.
>>>>>
>>>>> Assuming the FreeIPMI ssif driver doesn't have bugs (I don't have a
>>>>> machine that uses SSIF, so I've never tried it, I can only assume the
>>>>> original writers did it without bugs), it's possible the OpenIPMI kernel
>>>>> driver probes for addresses in an alternate order to the way FreeIPMI
>>>>> does, and by happen chance gets the right values.  That might explain
>>>>> things.
>>>>>
>>>>> Al
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 10:14 -0800, Christian Ruppert wrote:
>>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> take a look at the attachments for "impi-locate" and "bmc-info --debug"
>>>>>> with debug/trace enabled.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The kernel driver is only available through OpenIPMI and the patches are
>>>>>> only available up to kernel 2.6.35. I didn't get to the OpenIPMI kernel
>>>>>> drivers yet to port them to .36 and above. So I'd like to use FreeIPMI
>>>>>> instead if it works without any kernel drivers at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>


-- 
Regards,
Christian Ruppert

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]