[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study
|
From: |
Richard Smith |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study |
|
Date: |
Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:04:29 +0100 (BST) |
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Tom Coady wrote:
> I assume Paul was responding to a reply that went off list, as seems to
> be the case by default. Perhaps MJR can fix this to reply to list by
> default, assuming others consider this a good idea?
Personally I haven't chosen a side on this issue, but whenever I have seen
it suggested, it has been very controversial:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
--
Richard
- [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study, Tom Coady, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study, Paul, 2003/08/24
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study, Chris Croughton, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study, ian, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study, Paul, 2003/08/24
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study, Tom Coady, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study,
Richard Smith <=
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study, Tom Coady, 2003/08/25
- [Fsfe-uk] Use of Reply-To in the mailing list, Chris Croughton, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Use of Reply-To in the mailing list, MJ Ray, 2003/08/26
- [Fsfe-uk] Reply-To, List-Id, RFCs, mail clients etc (was: QnetiQ study), MJ Ray, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Reply-To, List-Id, RFCs, mail clients etc, Tom Coady, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Reply-To, List-Id, RFCs, mail clients etc, Tom Coady, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study, ian, 2003/08/25
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [Fsfe-uk] Reply-To on the mailing list, Chris Croughton, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Reply-To on the mailing list, Tom Coady, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Reply-To on the mailing list, Andrew Savory, 2003/08/26