Re: [Fsfe-uk] Reply-To on the mailing list

[Tom Coady]

Chris Croughton wrote:

> Damn, no, it was supposed to be to the list.  Which is an excellent (if
> unintentional) example of why the Reply-To needs munging...
>  

:) Again apologies for regurgitating this topic. As MJR says this will 
soon be a problem of the past if the RFCs get through to implementation. 
I guess I mentioned it because I had forgotten the rather unique nature 
of this list, but as long as I remember it's no problem to reply all, 
change fsfe from Cc: to To: and delete the originator from To: ;)