|
From: | Tom Coady |
Subject: | Re: [Fsfe-uk] QnetiQ study |
Date: | Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:54:12 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030723 Thunderbird/0.1 |
Richard Smith wrote:
Personally I haven't chosen a side on this issue, but whenever I have seen it suggested, it has been very controversial: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Thanks for the URL - I had no idea anyone had such strong feelings on this. Unfortunately I don't think /any/ of the points made are valid. I will save you all a point by point rebuttal, but one element I thought particularly wrong is that all good mail clients give a reply to list option. I've seen this in Opera, but not in Moz/Tbird, other than reply-all which would result in sending duplicate messages to the author.
In any case I apologise for resurrecting a long buried skeleton, and in doing so taking this whole subject off topic.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |