[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Interpretation of random tester output
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Interpretation of random tester output |
Date: |
06 Mar 2004 22:06:48 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Greetings! OK, that's our bogey. We're at about 80k now and counting
with no failures on the 1000 size.
Take care,
"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:
> Camm Maguire wrote:
>
> > OK. Paul, what is the longest run (of this size) you've had with
> > clisp with no failure?
>
> After they fixed the last compiler bug, I ran it for 525,000 iterations
> on forms of size 1000, and 42,000 iterations on forms of size 10,000,
> with no failures. I've run it a bit more since then with no more
> failures.
>
> IIRC, the random tester found a dozen bugs in clisp, and all have
> been fixed.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, (continued)
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/03/02
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/03
- Message not available
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/05
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/03/10
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/10
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gcl-devel] Interpretation of random tester output, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/10