[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Interpretation of random tester output
From: |
Paul F. Dietz |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Interpretation of random tester output |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Mar 2004 20:22:51 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031210 |
Camm Maguire wrote:
OK. Paul, what is the longest run (of this size) you've had with
clisp with no failure?
After they fixed the last compiler bug, I ran it for 525,000 iterations
on forms of size 1000, and 42,000 iterations on forms of size 10,000,
with no failures. I've run it a bit more since then with no more
failures.
IIRC, the random tester found a dozen bugs in clisp, and all have
been fixed.
Paul
- [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, (continued)
- [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/02
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/03/02
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/03
- Message not available
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/05
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/03/10
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/10
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gcl-devel] Interpretation of random tester output, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/10