Re: [Gcl-devel] Windows random test results

[Camm Maguire]

Greetings!

Mike!  You did it!  That macro certainly needs to be defined, as its
analog is in sfaslelf.c and sfaslbfd.c.  Gcc is not obligated in any
way to put init at offset 0.  Great!  It sounds as if this solves *all
known problems*,  Yes?  Kudos!

Take care,

Mike Thomas <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi all.
> 
> I've checked in the changes to fix the object initialisation bug on
> Windows in stable branch.  While doing the code cleanup I had the
> preliminary stable branch -O3 GCL running the HEAD random tester and
> here are the results so far:
> 
> CL-TEST>(loop-random-int-forms 1000 8)
>       1 | 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
> 1500 1600 1700
> 
> Memory usage constantly hovers between 32,000 and 33,000 KBytes while
> the VM size is stable on 106,168 KBytes.
> 
> A concurrent CVS Maxima build at the object file load stage was around
> 38,000 and 91,220 KBytes respectively.
> 
> CVS Maxima builds and passes all tests.
> 
> I'll aim to leave a random tester going tonight once I've rebuilt the
> new version but it all looks good from here.
> 
> Camm, is the console output the only place I need to look for errors
> from the random tester?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> MIke Thomas.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah