Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2.....

[Camm Maguire]

Thanks, Vadim!  OK I'll push 0 for the second value unless Mike knows
how to get child runtimes on mingw.

Take care,

"Vadim V. Zhytnikov" <address@hidden> writes:

> Camm Maguire ?????:
> > Greetings!
> > "Vadim V. Zhytnikov" <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >>Hi! Camm and Mike please forgive me for my inactivity in the
> >>time or release eve. I'm not yet recovered from my galleys
> >>to do anything useful for GCL - I was barely able to follow
> >>your wonderful development.  Today I've got a few spare hours
> >>to test current GCL cvs (2.6.1 tag).
> >>
> >>Recent Camm maxpage optimization works great!  I've got
> >>significant performance improvement on many tests.
> >>Note: new (time ...) function is broken on Windows.
> > Thanks!  Mike, is this a simple issue?
> >
> 
> The point is that on UNIX get_internal_run_time returns
> two values (run time and child time) while on mingw it
> returns just one value.  Thus on mingw child time
> gets value NIL and this nonnumber value breaks
> TIME.  One can either make get_internal_run_time return
> 0 as second value on mingw or fix TIME to cope
> with NIL.  I don't know which way is correct.
> 
> 
> >
> >>Unfortunately Maxima build ignore-errors bug is still here.
> >>
> > Argh!  I was banking on the hope that the ansi-crash and this bug
> > were manifestations of the same thing.  Are we all sure we are using
> > the same carefully balanced compiler optimization options?  Mike, can
> > you reproduce? Take care,
> >
> 
> -- 
>       Vadim V. Zhytnikov
> 
>        <address@hidden>
>       <address@hidden>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah