Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2.....

[Camm Maguire]

Greetings, and thanks for looking into this!

"Vadim V. Zhytnikov" <address@hidden> writes:

> Today trying to debug pathname problem I've got
> some new strange result (latest Maxima and GCL 2.6.1 CVS, gcc 3.3.1,
> binutils 2.15.90 20040222). Maxima build fails but in quite different
> fashion, things even don't come close to compiling any files
> =============================================================
> $ make
> Making all in src
> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/vadim/maxima/src'
> test -d binary-gcl || mkdir binary-gcl
> test -d binary-gcl/numerical || mkdir binary-gcl/numerical
> test -d binary-gcl/numerical/slatec || mkdir binary-gcl/numerical/slatec
> gcl -batch -eval '(progn (load "../lisp-utils/defsystem.lisp")
> (funcall (intern "OPERATE-ON-SYSTEM" :mk) "maxima" :compile :verbose
> t))' && \
> gcl -batch -eval '(progn (load "../lisp-utils/defsystem.lisp")
> (funcall (intern "OPERATE-ON-SYSTEM" :mk) "maxima" :load :verbose t)
> (when (fboundp (quote si::sgc-on))(si::sgc-on t)) (si:save-system
> "binary-gcl/maxima"))'
> 
> Warning:
> REQUIRE is being redefined.
> Can't find system named "maxima".
> 
> Fast links are on: do (use-fast-links nil) for debugging
> ...
> =============================================================
> The same Maxima sources with earlier GCL 2.6.1 CVS (2004.04.05)
> produces usual pathname error.  Maybe the same problem shifted
> to another place?
> 

Could you please run both old (working) and newly broken versions
under strace -f and post the results?

Take care,

> 
> -- 
>       Vadim V. Zhytnikov
> 
>        <address@hidden>
>       <address@hidden>
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah