[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results |
Date: |
21 Jun 2004 15:34:27 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Greetings!
"Vadim V. Zhytnikov" <address@hidden> writes:
> Camm Maguire writes:
>
> <snip>
>
>
> > b) Shortly after writing this, I will put up at
> > http://people.debian.org/~camm/gabriel.tgz
> > the benchmark suite I used with the slight modifications as
> > mentioned on the web page. I'd be most appreciative if
> > those in the know could run this suite as well, as well as
> > look it over for mistakes/oversights.
>
> Please do it. I'd like to repeat your benchmarks on
> the Athlon XP 300. Maybe some tests under considiration are
> strongly CPU dependent (Pentium 4 vs Athlon). At leat I know
> some other lisp tests (Reduce CAS test with Portable Standard
> Lisp) which dislikes Pentium 4 and favor Pentium III and
> especially Athlon - Pentium 4 is 2-3 (!!!) times slower.
>
Should be there now.
> <snip>
>
> > Peter Graves <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>There was a little discussion on #lisp yesterday about the benchmark
> >>results on this page:
> >>
> >> http://people.debian.org/~camm/GCL_2_6_2_tests.html
> >>
> >>To add another data point, I ran the Boyer benchmark on GCL CVS head
> >>(built with --enable-ansi) and several other implementations, using an
> >>Athlon XP 2100+ machine running Linux 2.6.0, with the results below.
> >>
> >>The benchmark I used was extracted from Eric Marsden's cl-bench suite
> >>and is available here:
> >>
> >> http://armedbear.org/boyer.lisp
> >>
> >>I added (declaim (optimize speed)) at the top of the file (and turned
> >>off *gc-verbose* for CMUCL).
> >>
> >>For each system, I simply did (compile-file "boyer.lisp"), (load *),
> >>and then (test 100) 3 times.
> >>
> >>GET-INTERNAL-RUN-TIME was used for timing.
> >>
> >>The results (best of 3 runs for each system):
> >>
>
> I confirm these results on Linux 2.4.26,
> Athlon XP 3000+, 512Mb
>
> >> GCL (GNU Common Lisp) 2.7.0 ANSI Jun 17 2004 17:50:11
> >>
> >> 3.22 seconds
>
> GCL 2.6.2 ANSI - 2.78 seconds
>
OK, while this is worse than my result, I'd like to see the
differences when you add proclamation as described in my note. Is
(load *) the same as (load "boyer")?
Take care,
> >>
> >> CMU Common Lisp CVS release-18e-branch + minimal debian patches
> >>
> >> 2.87 seconds
>
> CMUCL 18e - 2.26 seconds
>
> >>
> >> SBCL 0.8.11
> >>
> >> 2.592 seconds
>
> SBCL 0.8.8 - 2.54 seconds
>
> >>
> >> Allegro CL 6.2 Trial Edition
> >>
> >> 3.79 seconds
>
> ACL 6.2 Trial - 3.79 seconds (?)
>
> >>
> >> CLISP 2.33.1 (2004-05-22)
> >>
> >> 18.059256 seconds
>
>
> CLISP 2.33.1 - 15.48 seconds
>
> >>
> >> ABCL 0.0.3.15+ (Jun 17 2004 12:21:53) (Java 1.5.0-beta2)
> >>
> >> 16.786 seconds
> >>
> >>-Peter
> >>
>
>
> --
> Vadim V. Zhytnikov
>
> <address@hidden>
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
- [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Peter Graves, 2004/06/18
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Vadim V. Zhytnikov, 2004/06/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results,
Camm Maguire <=
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Peter Graves, 2004/06/22
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Christophe Rhodes, 2004/06/22
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/22
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Christophe Rhodes, 2004/06/22
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/22
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Raymond Toy, 2004/06/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/29
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Vadim V. Zhytnikov, 2004/06/23
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/23
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Vadim V. Zhytnikov, 2004/06/24