Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results

[Vadim V. Zhytnikov]

Camm Maguire writes:
> Greetings!
>
> "Vadim V. Zhytnikov" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>
> > Camm Maguire writes:
> >
> > > Greetings!
> > > Thanks Vadim!  Have added this result to the page.  Please give it a
> > > look over for possible errors.
> > > Take care,
> >
> > Minor correction.  Table heading reads: CMUCL 18e-9,
> > CLISP 2.33-2 - these are Debian package release numbers.
> > But I use my own ALT Linux builds so maybe just
> > CMUCL 18e and CLISP 2.33.1 would be more precise.
>
>
> OK, done.
>
>
> > I think it is good idea to put your gabliel.tgz
> > somewhere on GCL Savannah site and provide reference.
> > Let's everyone who cares get it and check our
> > results.
>
>
> I wanted to commit them to the cvs tree, but there does not appear to
> be a permissible license/copyright anywhere.  Richard Gabriel offers a
> pdf of the book from which these were taken on his website under the
> 'creative commons' license, which, to my understanding, is not
> compatible with the (L)GPL as it forbids commercial use.
>
> I will try to contact him for clarification.
>
> Take care,
>
>
> > I'd like to repeat gabriel test suite on yet one
> > more machine with Pentium III CPU - I have some
> > 733Mhz one near at hand.

Yet another banchmark now with Pentium III

Pentium III 733MHz, Linux 2.4.22, 384Mb

         GCL 2.6.2 ANSI   CMUCL 18e   CMU/GCL

BOYER        21.420        23.280      1.087
BROWSE       48.450        53.020      1.094
CTAK         4.260         2.040       0.479
DDERIV       17.470        18.040      1.033
DERIV        15.880        12.000      0.756
DESTRU-MOD   16.720        15.220      0.910
DESTRU       23.500        15.230      0.648
DIV2         16.430        12.840      0.781
FFT-MOD      1.020         1.920       1.882
FFT          0.980         1.930       1.969
FPRINT       9.480         27.500      2.901
FREAD        5.770         12.160      2.107
FRPOLY       57.030        60.200      1.056
PUZZLE-MOD   6.390         66.030     10.333
PUZZLE       6.770         63.580      9.391
STAK         10.030        15.560      1.551
TAK-MOD      7.230         8.720       1.206
TAK          7.300         8.890       1.218
TAKL         2.710         4.550       1.679
TAKR         4.120         5.240       1.271
TPRINT       17.950        29.150      1.624
TRAVERSE     169.100       106.000     0.627
TRIANG-MOD   133.470       885.950     6.638
TRIANG       149.620       157.240     1.051


--------------   SESSION   ------------------

       For gcl Common Lisp
??? ??? 23 22:14:58 MSD 2004

BOYER        21.420
BROWSE       48.450
CTAK         4.260
DDERIV       17.470
DERIV        15.880
DESTRU-MOD   16.720
DESTRU       23.500
DIV2         16.430
FFT-MOD      1.020
FFT          0.980
FPRINT       9.480
FREAD        5.770
FRPOLY       57.030
PUZZLE-MOD   6.390
PUZZLE       6.770
STAK         10.030
TAK-MOD      7.230
TAK          7.300
TAKL         2.710
TAKR         4.120
TPRINT       17.950
TRAVERSE     169.100
TRIANG-MOD   133.470
TRIANG       149.620

--------------   SESSION   ------------------

       For lisp Common Lisp
??? ??? 23 22:29:31 MSD 2004

BOYER        23.280
BROWSE       53.020
CTAK         2.040
DDERIV       18.040
DERIV        12.000
DESTRU-MOD   15.220
DESTRU       15.230
DIV2         12.840
FFT-MOD      1.920
FFT          1.930
FPRINT       27.500
FREAD        12.160
FRPOLY       60.200
PUZZLE-MOD   66.030
PUZZLE       63.580
STAK         15.560
TAK-MOD      8.720
TAK          8.890
TAKL         4.550
TAKR         5.240
TPRINT       29.150
TRAVERSE     106.000
TRIANG-MOD   885.950
TRIANG       157.240

---------------------------------------------

It looks like Pentium 4 (I mean 2.4GHz Xeon) desn't
like some CMUCL tests.

BTW, on Athlon I've tried -march=i586 vs -march=athlon
but found no difference.

--
     Vadim V. Zhytnikov

     <address@hidden>