gluster-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gluster-devel] Feature Idea.


From: Gerry Reno
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Feature Idea.
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 16:31:41 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219)

Nick Clarke wrote:
Hi,

-- Sorry to double post but my previous message got messed up somewhere along 
the way.

I stumbled across Gluster while looking for a Linux cluster system and 
instantly had a big smile on my face after a couple of clicks.  This is a great 
project and not a small one.

I did have an idea for a feature, not sure if it would something for Gluster or 
the scheduler.

Power Save: The ability to Suspend/Sleep/Shutdown nodes (or groups of nodes) 
when they are not needed.

Node states:
  - Suspend: Do not start up until a set time for example.
  - Sleep: Faster start up
- Shutdown: Longer to start up but no power consumption
Node type examples:
  - Data Centre
      Achieve
      Live
      ….
  - HPC
      Render Farm
      Web Server
      ….
  - Etc..

- Timed Suspend/Sleep/Shutdown
7pm – 9am for example
- Rule based power saver based on node type e.g. Data Centre, HPC node etc..
An example: A group of data centre nodes could be used for achieve and rarely used, so they could be set to Suspend after 2 hours of no use and only started when something is required. As their function is storing achieved data the user would allow for a small start up delay (common files could be cache on other nodes).
- Suspend/Sleep/Shutdown when not needed.  Wake-On-Lan when needed (example: 
incoming large job, data access or during a time window).

This would allow me and I’m sure others to save a lot of running costs.

Nick


Nick,
I like your general thoughts on this. Cutting down the running costs is a good goal for any cluster-based setup. Right now I would just settle for having GlusterFS feature-complete, stable and major-bug free. But definitely I would second adding these conservation features to the list.

Regards,
Gerry






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]