[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] Crawling and indexing hardware
From: |
Daniel Maher |
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] Crawling and indexing hardware |
Date: |
Fri, 9 May 2008 13:23:06 +0200 |
On Fri, 9 May 2008 11:31:36 +0100 (BST) address@hidden wrote:
> > At least, that's my understanding of the situation - please correct
> > me if i'm wrong. :)
>
> In a word - no. If the nodes are connected, then only the actual 1
> byte change will be replicated. If the nodes are disconnected, then
> the "self heal" will copy the entire 5GB file when the nodes connect.
Aah, yes, my bad - i was confusing self-heal with normal activity.
I'll go back to my Friday afternoon loafing off now. ;)
--
Daniel Maher <dma AT witbe.net>
- [Gluster-devel] Crawling and indexing hardware, Marcus Herou, 2008/05/07
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Crawling and indexing hardware, Daniel Maher, 2008/05/09
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Crawling and indexing hardware, Marcus Herou, 2008/05/09
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Crawling and indexing hardware, Marcus Herou, 2008/05/09
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Crawling and indexing hardware, Anand Avati, 2008/05/09
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Crawling and indexing hardware, Krishna Srinivas, 2008/05/09
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Crawling and indexing hardware, Marcus Herou, 2008/05/09
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Crawling and indexing hardware, gordan, 2008/05/09
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Crawling and indexing hardware, Marcus Herou, 2008/05/09
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Crawling and indexing hardware, gordan, 2008/05/09
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Crawling and indexing hardware, Marcus Herou, 2008/05/09
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Crawling and indexing hardware, gordan, 2008/05/09