[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:41:05 +0100 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Well, the High-on-Crack Court is of opinion that replacing OS bootloader
> > constitutes creation of a derivative work that needs permission from OS'
> > copyright owner because "[w]ithout a bootloader, Mac OS X would not
> > operate." Do you share that absurd 'legal' reasoning, dear Hyman?
>
> The court referred to precedent in D&B v. Grace. Think of it
> as a book - if someone takes a book and prepares a new one by
> replacing some chapters of it with chapters of his own, is the
> result a derivative work?
It's more like replacing one foreword with another foreword, silly. The
replacement doesn't constitute a derivative work of a book unless
foreword contains protected expression taken from book.
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, John Fuhrer, 2009/11/15
Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, David Kastrup, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/11/16