[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:26:36 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Yeah and if a drunktard judge rules that the sky is green Hyman would
believe that the sky is green until a higher court says that that the
sky isn't green.
This has nothing to do with belief. If a court says that you
have illegally prepared a derivative work, then that's what
you have done, because the court rules. That's what courts do.
Stop being utter idiot Hyman.
Why? You never have.
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, (continued)
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, David Kastrup, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/11/16