[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:44:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> writes:
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>> Yeah and if a drunktard judge rules that the sky is green Hyman would
>> believe that the sky is green until a higher court says that that the
>> sky isn't green.
>
> This has nothing to do with belief. If a court says that you
> have illegally prepared a derivative work, then that's what
> you have done, because the court rules.
Uh no. What you have done is what you have physically done. The court
does not _rule_ about that. It may _find_ what you have actually done.
Whether or not it is wrong about this finding has no legal consequences:
it has physical consequences for you. If the findings are later found
to be wrong, that does not affect the validity of the legal argument
(and thus its consequences as a precendence).
What the court _does_ rule about is what your physical acts _mean_
according to the law, and what legal consequences the classification of
your acts have according to the law.
> That's what courts do.
No. They don't tell me what I have done. They tell me what laws
correspond with what I have done.
The can't _rule_ that the sky is green, but they may hypothetically
_find_ that the sky is green and rule according to that finding. What a
higher court does may depend on its revisiting the evidence.
>> Stop being utter idiot Hyman.
>
> Why? You never have.
You can say that again.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, (continued)
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Hyman Rosen, 2009/11/16
Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/11/16