gnugo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[gnugo-devel] Bad game


From: Heikki Levanto
Subject: [gnugo-devel] Bad game
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 11:30:17 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i

GNU Go (3.7.1 from CVS) just played an exceptionally bad game against
me. 9x9 game, 2 stones handicap. I will analyze it further later this
weekend, but I wanted to show it anyway.

The comments here are my own, so take with a grain of salt, I am only
5kyu.


B 8: B5
feels a bit funny. I would consider E4 or D6

B 10: E4
Why not defending C7 ??

B 16: C8
Gote. Does gg think it can live ?

B 28: A5
Why fatten the sacrifice?
B3 would be more safe for the corner, and as deadly for w.

B32: D6
Silly self-atari, doesn't do anything

B42: A8
Wasted move! That corner is dead ?! H9 would live there. Or something at the
bottom (A2? E2?)

B48: Black resigns - and for a good reason! Not a stone alive!



(;GM[1]FF[4]
CA[UTF-8]
AP[Quarry:0.1.10]
SZ[9]
HA[2]
KM[5.5]
PB[GNU Go 3.7.1]
PW[Unknown]
RE[W+Resign]
AB[gc][cg]
;W[fg];B[cc];W[ec];B[fd];W[ed];B[ee];W[de];B[be];W[cd];B[ef]
;W[bc];B[db];W[eb];B[bb];W[bd];B[cb];W[ge];B[eg];W[fe];B[fc]
;W[hd];B[gb];W[df];B[dg];W[bf];B[cf];W[ce];B[ae];W[bg];B[bh]
;W[ad];B[dd];W[dc];B[fh];W[gg];B[fb];W[ea];B[fa];W[af];B[hc]
;W[gh];B[ab];W[da];B[eh];W[ha];B[ib];W[ah];
)



-- 
Heikki Levanto   "In Murphy We Turst"     heikki (at) lsd (dot) dk





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]