Re: [gnugo-devel] Bad game

[Gunnar Farnebäck]

Dan wrote:
> I don't understand how B resigned since the boardsize is not 19x19.

See patch gunnar_7_1.17,
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnugo-devel/2004-11/msg00032.html.

> 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 22 all look like bad moves. Maybe the
> semeai code is at fault. I guess 16 is worth looking at first.

Yes, it looks like the semeai code is involved.

Paul wrote:
> Seems like `resigning.html' should be revised.

So far resigning.html only discusses GNU Go 3.6. This case of
resignation was added in 3.7.1.

> If this behaviour seems undesirable, we should also revise GNU Go
> itself.

Why should it not resign if all stones look dead and it can't come up
with anything better than a pass?

/Gunnar