[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Bad game
From: |
Heikki Levanto |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Bad game |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:56:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i |
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 07:17:57PM +0100, Gunnar Farneb?ck wrote:
>
> Why should it not resign if all stones look dead and it can't come up
> with anything better than a pass?
Indeed! I think the resignation was the only positive surprise in this
game. I vot for keeping it.
--
Heikki Levanto "In Murphy We Turst" heikki (at) lsd (dot) dk
- [gnugo-devel] Bad game, Heikki Levanto, 2004/12/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Bad game, bump, 2004/12/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Bad game, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/12/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Bad game, bump, 2004/12/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Bad game, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/12/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Bad game, Gunnar Farnebäck, 2004/12/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Bad game, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/12/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Bad game, bump, 2004/12/11
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Bad game,
Heikki Levanto <=
Re: [gnugo-devel] Bad game, Heikki Levanto, 2004/12/12