[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: switching from HTML 4.0 to XHTML 1.0 Transitional
From: |
David Paleino |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: switching from HTML 4.0 to XHTML 1.0 Transitional |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:33:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061220) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Victor Engmark ha scritto:
> On 2/21/07, *David Paleino* <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
>
> ...
>
>
> Bravo! Since you're willing to start this, I'd recommend that you go
> straight for the newest W3C recommendation - XHTML 1.1. I've been using
> it for years, and it's actually quite simple.
Well, I think I've always used XHTML 1.1. Maybe I'm just calling it by
the wrong name. ;-)
> --
> Victor Engmark
> Quid quid latine dictum sit, altum viditar - What is said in Latin,
> sounds profound
Eh ehm. It should be "viditur". ;-)
Cheers,
David
- --
Linux Registered User #334216
Get FireFox! >> http://snipurl.com/gofoxygo/ <<
Blog >> http://www.hanskalabs.net/ <<
Staff >> http://www.debianizzati.org/ <<
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF3J6l5qqQFxOSsXQRAqdEAJ4loiSMCBlgEADHTvYgxtQzCR5OewCgrdcA
subuj8hjA/mYTOjLoSNGIO8=
=Drn/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Proposal: switching from HTML 4.0 to XHTML 1.0 Transitional, David Paleino, 2007/02/21
- Re: Proposal: switching from HTML 4.0 to XHTML 1.0 Transitional, Victor Engmark, 2007/02/21
- Re: Proposal: switching from HTML 4.0 to XHTML 1.0 Transitional, Davi Leal, 2007/02/21
- Re: Proposal: switching from HTML 4.0 to XHTML 1.0 Transitional, Victor Engmark, 2007/02/21
- Re: Proposal: switching from HTML 4.0 to XHTML 1.0 Transitional,
David Paleino <=
- HTML vs XHTML, Davi Leal, 2007/02/24
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, Victor Engmark, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, David Paleino, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, Victor Engmark, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, David Paleino, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, Victor Engmark, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, Davi Leal, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, David Paleino, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML 4.01 Strict + CSS -- Later XHTML if convenient?, Davi Leal, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML 4.01 Strict + CSS -- Later XHTML if convenient?, Davi Leal, 2007/02/25