[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Proposal: switching from HTML 4.0 to XHTML 1.0 Transitional
From: |
David Paleino |
Subject: |
Proposal: switching from HTML 4.0 to XHTML 1.0 Transitional |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:22:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061220) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
since I've read the last thread about POST and GET, suddenly an idea
came to improve our webapp.
Why not switching the _whole_ webapp from HTML4.0 Transitional (as
declared in the doctype) to XHTML 1.0 Transitional?
As read into w3schools.com, XHTML has some requirements:
* XHTML elements must be properly nested
* XHTML elements must always be closed
* XHTML elements must be in lowercase
* XHTML documents must have one root element
I think that this way the documents are _necessarily_
standard-compliant, as an improper nesting / a missing closing tag / ...
would raise an error (I think).
It's not that difficult, I can start working on it as soon as you agree.
MTC,
David
- --
Linux Registered User #334216
Get FireFox! >> http://snipurl.com/gofoxygo/ <<
Blog >> http://www.hanskalabs.net/ <<
Staff >> http://www.debianizzati.org/ <<
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF3I3P5qqQFxOSsXQRArnCAJ4gFzozecdQuzlJjHYCj+efsAMKQQCfZggA
R30NbYBumFYYuWa1RD13QHY=
=Ru/P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Proposal: switching from HTML 4.0 to XHTML 1.0 Transitional,
David Paleino <=
- Re: Proposal: switching from HTML 4.0 to XHTML 1.0 Transitional, Victor Engmark, 2007/02/21
- Re: Proposal: switching from HTML 4.0 to XHTML 1.0 Transitional, Davi Leal, 2007/02/21
- Re: Proposal: switching from HTML 4.0 to XHTML 1.0 Transitional, Victor Engmark, 2007/02/21
- Re: Proposal: switching from HTML 4.0 to XHTML 1.0 Transitional, David Paleino, 2007/02/21
- HTML vs XHTML, Davi Leal, 2007/02/24
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, Victor Engmark, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, David Paleino, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, Victor Engmark, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, David Paleino, 2007/02/25