[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The team have XHTML experience
From: |
Davi Leal |
Subject: |
Re: The team have XHTML experience |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:05:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
Victor Engmark wrote:
> I'm just suggesting. I know it'll work, because I've been doing it for
> years, at work and on my own site. But I'm not interested in laying down
> work on this if it'll be removed or ignored.
You have experience at it. I don't. I truth you. So, I think we must replace
the current HTML code with the new XHTML when it be ready. I will not object
it. Anyway others have something to say too.
Davi
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, (continued)
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, Victor Engmark, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, David Paleino, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, Victor Engmark, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, David Paleino, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, Victor Engmark, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, Davi Leal, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, David Paleino, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML 4.01 Strict + CSS -- Later XHTML if convenient?, Davi Leal, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML 4.01 Strict + CSS -- Later XHTML if convenient?, Davi Leal, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML 4.01 Strict + CSS -- Later XHTML if convenient?, Victor Engmark, 2007/02/25
- Re: The team have XHTML experience,
Davi Leal <=
- Re: HTML vs XHTML, MJ Ray, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML 4.01 Strict + CSS, Davi Leal, 2007/02/25
- Re: HTML 4.01 Strict + CSS, Victor Engmark, 2007/02/25
- Re: CVS branch for XHTML ?, Davi Leal, 2007/02/25
- Re: CVS branch for XHTML ?, David Paleino, 2007/02/25
- Re: CVS branch, Davi Leal, 2007/02/25
- Re: The CVS branch is right, Davi Leal, 2007/02/25
- Re: CVS branch for XHTML ?, Victor Engmark, 2007/02/25
- Re: XHTML quicker ?, Davi Leal, 2007/02/25