[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions"
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions" |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:40:29 -0400 |
* OpenBSD is Free because it does not ship anything that is Non-Free
Software.
What I heard is that all the BSD variants provide for easy
installation of non-free software through the ports system.
If this is true, then none of them is free.
Note: Not all Binary Large OBjects (BLOBs) are Non-Free Software, because
of
BLOBs can be data (not compiled source code) licensed under a FS license.
It is possible for a blob to be data. However, we need to verify that
it really is data, because the non-free object code is typically
dressed up as data.
Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions", Richard Stallman, 2007/10/01
- Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions",
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, Davi Leal, 2007/10/03
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/04
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, Davi Leal, 2007/10/04
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, MJ Ray, 2007/10/05
- Re: Debian vs gNewSense -- FS criteria, Davi Leal, 2007/10/05
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, John Darrington, 2007/10/05
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, MJ Ray, 2007/10/05
- Re: software distribution criteria, Davi Leal, 2007/10/05
- Re: software distribution criteria, MJ Ray, 2007/10/05
- Re: Debian vs gNewSense, Davi Leal, 2007/10/05