[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Oct 2007 21:34:48 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 10:21:49AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
- gNewSense will include non-free-software material that Debian won't
(FDL-with-invariants and some badgeware), so Debian is freer by design
in that way,
First of all are you sure of your facts? So far as I'm aware, there
are no FDL-with-invariants manuals currently in gNewSense. Whether
they will accept them, I've not seen any authoritative answer. The
whole FDL issue is unfortunate, but so long as there are no
FDL-with-invariants in GNS, we all agree it's Free, so let's not start
an argument where we're all in agreement. I'm not exactly sure what
you mean by "badgeware".
- Debian is producing a GNU/Hurd version that gNewSense doesn't, so
Debian is freer by design in that way,
I don't think that GNS has been designed NOT to include a Hurd
version, it's just that that hasn't been a proirity to them.
- gNewSense pretends the non-free archives it can use (including
restricted / Multiverse) do not exist, even though it is easy to find
out how to use them, while the Debian project tracks some non-free
packages, particularly when trying to prepare for relicensing as free
software, so gNewSense is slightly freer for developers and organisers
in that way, but there's little difference for most users - if they
want to add automatically-installable non-free software, it's there
ready-to-go.
You're being silly here. Refusing to advertise a product is not
"pretending that it doesn't exist". You might as well say that Debian
pretends that MS windows doesn't exist.
I think it's entirely appropriate that a Free software project avoids
giving publicity to non-free software. Doing otherwise is
incompatible with its very objective.
J'
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions", (continued)
Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions", Richard Stallman, 2007/10/01
Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions", Richard Stallman, 2007/10/01
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, Davi Leal, 2007/10/03
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/04
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, Davi Leal, 2007/10/04
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, MJ Ray, 2007/10/05
- Re: Debian vs gNewSense -- FS criteria, Davi Leal, 2007/10/05
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case,
John Darrington <=
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, MJ Ray, 2007/10/05
- Re: software distribution criteria, Davi Leal, 2007/10/05
- Re: software distribution criteria, MJ Ray, 2007/10/05
- Re: Debian vs gNewSense, Davi Leal, 2007/10/05
- Re: Debian vs gNewSense, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/06
Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, John Darrington, 2007/10/06
Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, MJ Ray, 2007/10/07
Re: software distribution criteria -- The Debian case, Davi Leal, 2007/10/07
Re: software distribution criteria -- The Debian case, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/08
Re: software distribution criteria, Davi Leal, 2007/10/08