[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case
From: |
Davi Leal |
Subject: |
Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Oct 2007 22:50:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
Richard Stallman wrote:
> > OpenBSD do not ship any non-free stuff, or have it on ftp mirrors,
> > or have packages. All non-free stuff have is ports.
>
> The ports system in a BSD distribution is a centrally maintained part
> of the distribution. For instance, the ports system of OpenBSD comes
> with OpenBSD, and the developers of OpenBSD decide which packages to
> include in it. They explicitly put some non-free programs into the
> ports system, which is why those non-free programs are included.
>
> > Let me know if we can tag OpenBSD as a free software distribution.
>
> No, you can't.
>
> The same is true of all three variants of BSD. None of them can be
> treated as a free system. It is sad that they come so close to
> qualifying, and yet fall just a little short.
Now, I personally agree with you.
I have checked with some OpenBSD developers. It seams they work hard to do
not include non-free software BLOBs in the kernel, but as you write they
provide for easy installation of non-free software through the ports system.
It seems a philosophical contradiction. I would name it _an addiction_ to
some non-free software products. For example, some of such developers suffer
an addiction to the Opera browser, as I myself suffer one to the Debian
software distribution.
> *********************************************************************
> However, if someone offers a sysadmin job for a free installation of a
> BSD or GNU/Linux system, we can list that job, even if the
> installation was made using a distro which includes non-free programs.
We could add a new 'Almost-Free' tag, and allow entries tagged so be exposed
to the public in offers and resumes.
The 'Almost-Free' tag could be applied only to software distributions, not to
programs, protocols, etc.
List of tags and classification examples:
'Abstract' Firewalls, Embedded Development, etc.
'Free' C++, gNewSense, PHP, Ruby, etc.
'Almost-Free' OpenBSD, Debian, FreeBSD, NetBSD, etc.
'Non-Free' Microsoft Windows, etc.
Note that anything tagged as 'Non-Free' is not exposed to the public.
- Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions", (continued)
Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions", Richard Stallman, 2007/10/01
Re: Free Software criteria -- about "Software distributions", Richard Stallman, 2007/10/01
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, Davi Leal, 2007/10/03
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/04
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case,
Davi Leal <=
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, MJ Ray, 2007/10/05
- Re: Debian vs gNewSense -- FS criteria, Davi Leal, 2007/10/05
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, John Darrington, 2007/10/05
- Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, MJ Ray, 2007/10/05
- Re: software distribution criteria, Davi Leal, 2007/10/05
- Re: software distribution criteria, MJ Ray, 2007/10/05
- Re: Debian vs gNewSense, Davi Leal, 2007/10/05
- Re: Debian vs gNewSense, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/06
Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, John Darrington, 2007/10/06
Re: software distribution criteria -- The OpenBSD case, MJ Ray, 2007/10/07