[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Qt licensing issues for GNUmed
From: |
richard terry |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Qt licensing issues for GNUmed |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:44:51 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
Looking nice in gui is important - it often makes or breaks usage of an
application. It ok to be purist, but in the long term all efforts may come to
nothing.
Personally I like QT because it not only looks good, it is twenty times easier
to sit and play with the gui and get something that looks good. Sure, one can
prototype in QT and then translate the design to wxPython, and I suspect in
the long run that from the flavour or replies on the list we won't (sob sob)
be using QT.
From talking to Ian, wxPython doesn't seem to come up too well under windows,
does anyone else have experience of that.
Regards
Richard
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 01:42 am, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > > Hmmm, any other reason to start using yet another toolbox except that
> > > it looks nice?
> >
> > He didn't mean look when he said look.
>
> Well for sure, my question was a little bit provocating. I just wonder
> if there are real reasons to use Qt other than people try to preserve
> their favourite toolkit. I'm really interested even if I'm sounding
> perhaps offensive.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnumed-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Qt licensing issues for GNUmed, Les Ferguson, 2003/08/10
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Qt licensing issues for GNUmed, ju0815nk, 2003/08/11