[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Questions re database schema:street:address:urb:count
From: |
J Busser |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Questions re database schema:street:address:urb:country |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:51:43 -0700 |
At 11:53 AM +0200 8/31/04, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> id_street is indeed a foreign key and there should be a "references
> street(id)" after the definition of the id_street column.
-----------^^^^^
There is. Deficient viewers are in use here.
Maybe it is not a deficient "viewer" (software vs person ?? >:-) ))
- maybe a problem of expectation / familiarity with how the schema db
output is formatted?
In my browser, the visual clue to id_street being a foreign key is
not given by any columns "to the right".
Rather, the *left*-most column in the table is "F-Key" containing, on
the same line as (but to the *left*) of id_street, the hyperlinked
entity "street.id".
As far as I can tell, THAT is how one identifies whether a field
"is" (or more correctly... ???)
"has its permitted values constrained by"
... a specified foreign key.
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Questions re database schema:street:address:urb:country, (continued)
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Questions re database schema:street:address:urb:country, Ian Haywood, 2004/08/31
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Questions re database schema - naming, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/08/31
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Questions re database schema - nomenclature, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/08/31
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Questions re database schema - normalization, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/08/31
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Questions re database schema:street:address:urb:country, sjtan, 2004/08/31