gnumed-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] Time for a major re-think in 2005 - opinions


From: catmat
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] Time for a major re-think in 2005 - opinions
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:41:59 +1100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041231

Karsten Hilbert wrote:

with audit trailing of table updates in gnumed,  what about the use
of signing with private keys , or other authentication /non-repudiation
mechanism ?
The intention on my part was to do a clear-text dump (pg_dump)
of the entire database and hash that, send the hashes to
the notary servers and archive the dump along with the hashes
signed by the notary (and the public key thereof).


does sound simpler, and one could only  subvert the audit between
dumps.
If an identity's record was exported to another system, what would be the
protocol for supplying a verified audit with the record?


So, yes, writing code to facilitate that process would be very
welcome. Note that this should be run in the background
without any need for user interaction - it should not be part
of the GnuMed *client*. It could even run entirely on the
server.

Karsten





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]