Re: [Gnumed-devel] state of test results handling

[James Busser]

On 4-Apr-08, at 12:31 AM, James Busser wrote:
> I think
>
>          Select all abnormals

Oops!

I overlooked that the above would include previously-signed abnormals  
which could be many that go way back, including those already signed  
by the fk_intended_reviewer

This makes it more sensible to use the alternative from my last email:

> The alternative flow would be to *first* deal with abnormals [at a  
> stage when they had not yet been signed], and [then] *after* they  
> had been signed and their clinical significance decided, take care  
> of the remaining unsigned cells. If this makes more sense then I  
> would position left-most
>
>         Select unsigned abnormals <--- the "all" is not needed
>
> then to the right I would position "Select unsigned" and "Select  
> your unsigned"