[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Clinician call of judgement
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Clinician call of judgement |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:07:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
> ************+
> Adrian, Liz, Richard, Horst, Jim, Sebastian ...
>
> What's your vote:
>
> - track one pair of flags abnormal/significant per result or
>
> - track one possible pair of the flags *per user* per result
>
> Now it is still fairly easy to change things either way. We
> will still optionally store regardless:
>
> - a comment by the lab
> - a comment on the result itself by a clinician
> - a comment on the/each review
> - the lab's abnormality indicator
>
> *************
Well, no one seems to care, so I'll go ahead and implement
it. It'll ease a bunch of related things, too.
Tracking one pair of flags makes it a direct one-to-one
trait of the test result meaning it could be folded into the
very test_result table.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
Re: [Gnumed-devel] state of test results handling, James Busser, 2008/04/04
[Gnumed-devel] another vista at abnormality/relevance flags, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/04/09
Re: [Gnumed-devel] another vista at abnormality/relevance flags, James Busser, 2008/04/09
Re: [Gnumed-devel] another vista at abnormality/relevance flags, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/04/11
Re: [Gnumed-devel] another vista at abnormality/relevance flags, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/04/11
Re: [Gnumed-devel] state of test results handling, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/04/15
Re: [Gnumed-devel] state of test results handling, James Busser, 2008/04/16
Re: [Gnumed-devel] state of test results handling, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/04/17
Re: [Gnumed-devel] state of test results handling, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/04/18