Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Bootstrapping for production -- user accounts

[Sebastian Hilbert]

Am Donnerstag 06 August 2009 14:42:46 schrieb Karsten Hilbert:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:47:22PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > > I would make a strong vote to make a "clean" GNUmed part of 0.6.
> > >
> > > When time permits to refactor the bootstrap, what about
> > > - refactoring all of the test data import into a single bootstrap
> > > script file
> >
> > That is a lot of work.
> >
> > What about gnumed_v2, gnumed_v3, gnumed_v4, gnumed_v5,
> > gnumed_v6, gnumed_v7, gnumed_v8, gnumed_v9, gnumed_v10,
> > gnumed_v11 ?
>
> Maybe it is clearer to ask: What about branches rel-0-3,
> rel-0-4, rel-0-5 ?  Shall they all be enabled to produce a
> "clean" GNUmed database ? If not that would mean
> bootstrapping a v9 database from rel-0-4 will end up in
> something different then bootstrapping v9 from rel-0-5. Is
> that acceptable ?

Sure. I doubt anyone relies on rel-0-4 by the time rel-0-5 is released.
The truth is the user wants it the user gets it. In a few months we will have 
new issues :-) So better get this straight now before too many people start 
using GNUmed :-)

Sebastian